On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:27, Christophe Eymard <christophe.eymard@ravelsoft.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:34, Benjamin Fritz <fritzophrenic@gmail.com> wrote:On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Ben Fritz <fritzophrenic@gmail.com> wrote:Here's what I did get. Input file, highlight script, and output of
>
> I cannot reproduce on Windows Vista gvim 7.3.2,06 with the syntax
> rules you sent earlier on the snippet you send here.
>
> I also cannot reproduce, when I first set ft=javascript, and then
> source your rules, thinking maybe there was something in there which
> was interfering.
>
> With just your rules (not the javascript rules applied first), there
> are absolutely no syntax rules matching below the last line of the
> comment.
>
TOhtml attached.I have tried your syntax file, and it behaves as expected.Here is the one I made. It has the problem I described.
The conflicting rule is coContext ; this is the one I want applied, yet the javaScriptDocTags, while being "contained" still wins over it.
-- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment