> John Beckett wrote:
>
>> hsitz wrote:
>>> I'm author of the VimOrganizer plugin.
>>> http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3342
>>> ...
>>> It appears that there were 22 or 23 votes today,
>>> all for -1 karma.
>>
>> Some preliminary findings for the ratings of script 3342:
>>
>> Things look normal up to 2011-12-14 00:26.
>> In the next 12 seconds, there were 22 ratings of -1, each from a
>> different IP address.
>> Of those IPs, 19 also downloaded the spam script 3847.
>>
>> I can delete those bad ratings, but I won't do that at the
>> moment in case someone like Bram wants to have a look at the
>> data. [...]
>
> Sounds like the same thing what happened earlier. Although it's weird
> that the script was actually downloaded from the same IP addresses.
> That would not happen if the rating link was accidentally showing up
> somewhere. It's more like a crawler that goes through a list of URLs.
Yes, it seems the same as before. Are we still close enough to the
incident that the ratings could be correlated with something that
indicates a User-Agent header (which might show that it's a
poorly-written crawler)?
--
Best,
Ben
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment