On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Xell Liu <xell.liu@gmail.com> wrote:
thank you. Apparently it has just to be done like this way. Now I'm dealing with this problem by Perl. Hope Vim could accomplish it.
In fact, if your aim is not so strict, i.e. if you only need to
exclude ASCIIs, you could use [^\x00-\xff] . Hope it helps.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Chris Jones <cjns1989@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 09:53:55AM EDT, William Fugy wrote:
>
>> Question: how to match all Chinese chars?
>>
>> -----------------------------------
>> fenc=utf-16le
>> enc=utf-16le
>> termencoding=utf-16le
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> :g/[\%u4e00-\%u9fff]/
>> this command doesn't work.
>>
>> However
>> :g/\%u5728/
>> could match a single char '在'..
>>
>> thanks in advance.
>
> Doesn't work here either even with smaller ranges.. (Vim 7.2 and UTF-8).
>
> Unless s/o comes up with a better idea, you could try using the
> characters themselves instead of their code points but it looks like you> are going to run into another problem.. in my environment, ranges appear
Vim 7.3, +multi_lang
> to be limited to something like 256+ characters. Beyond that you get an
> 'E16 Invalid range' message.
>
> Unless I missed something, and if you absolutely need to do this, you
> could bypass the limitation by breaking up the range like so:
>> | :g/[一-仿伀-俿倀-儀 ... 鼀-龻]/
Good one! i'll give it a try. But so many characters,.....
>
> This corresponds to ranges:
>
> | \u4e00-\u4eff
> | \u4f00-\u4fff
> | \u5000-\u50ff
> | ..
> | \u9f00-\u9fbb¹
>
> Trouble is, this is going to add up to something like 80+ subranges and
> may cause you to run into other limitations. I haven't tested the whole
> range, only the above (it works here) but if nobody comes up with> a better idea, and you choose go down this path, I would suggest
> generating the regex programatically..
thank you. Apparently it has just to be done like this way. Now I'm dealing with this problem by Perl. Hope Vim could accomplish it.
>
> CJ
>> ¹ I think \u4e00-\u9fbb is the correct CJK range
Yes. it's accurate.
>
> --
> WE GET SIGNAL
>
> --
> You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
> Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
> For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment