On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Trey Sizemore <hjsizemore@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Trey Sizemore <hjsizemore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Christian Brabandt <cblists@256bit.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, June 11, 2012 22:33, Trey Sizemore wrote:
>>>> Notice how it doesn't preface the wrapped lines with > so that the
>>>> e-mail response looks as it should. It *did* used to do this, but not
>>>> sure what might have changed recently to cause it to stop working.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any guidance!
>>>
>>> Please read again my mail, to which you replied.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Christian. Following the steps you mentioned above results in
>> the same behavior (or mis behavior) of vim when using the 'gq'
>> variations on mails with long lines.
>>
>> Not sure what is going on!
>
> OK. Getting closer to the issue maybe. I noticed that the lines I
> have in my .vimrc for citing references using the F5 key are not being
> sourced. In other words, I was previously able to type a message in
> mutt (with vim as editor) and hit F5 to bring up a line to enter the
> website and then it would increment a reference number (starting with
> 1, then 2…).
>
> Now hitting the F5 key in an e-mail only inserts '<F5>' in the message.
>
> Any ideas why the .vimrc is not being read?
>
> Thanks!
OK, I had recently added a line in my .vimrc (set paste) for pasting
external contents into vim while maintaining formatting. It worked
great, but was hosing up the aforementioned pieces as editor for mutt.
Commenting out that line returned expected behavior.
So for pasting things into vim from now on, should I just invoke 'set
paste' before pasting and leave the entry out of my .vimrc?
Thanks.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment