Re: is there better way to define a customer Command like F[oobar]

Kent <kent.yuan@gmail.com> a écrit:
> many vim build in commands have abbreviation, e.g.
>
> :d[elete]
>
> user can type :d :de :del :dele ...delete
>
> Is there a better way to define a customer command (:command! Foobar)
> like it too?
>
> e.g.
>
> F[oobar]
>
> what I can think of is, defining 6 commands, calling same function
>
> F
> Fo
> Foo
> ....
>
> Foobar

You can use an incomplete command name if there is no ambiguity with
another command; for instance, if Foobar is your only command
beginning with F, then F, Fo, Foo, etc. are all ok. However, if you
have Funk too, then you must at least use Fo or Fu, and so on and so
forth.

Defining 6 commands or more will work for the most recently defined
command, in case of ambiguity, all the other being be deleted (with
Foobar and Funk, F will only work for one or the other).

Best,
Paul

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.