Ed Kostas wrote:
> 3- It seems that there is a Vi clone that does everything these lawyers want. It is fast in dealing with large Latex sources, it has an org-mode that works like emacs, etc. etc. It is called Evil. Third question: What am I loosing if I work with Evil?
>
>
A little googling yields this: https://gitorious.org/evil/pages/Home
Which describes Evil as "an *e*xtensible *vi* *l*ayer for Emacs
<http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/>. It emulates the main features of
Vim <http://www.vim.org/>, and provides facilities for writing custom
extensions."
In other words, it makes emacs look like vim. So all the features
they're using now - including the analysis routines written in lisp;
through a simpler interface.
But a larger question here: Why are they even considering moving to
Vim? They seem to be using a lot of critical emacs features
(particularly those based on lisp) - how would they be able to do their
work without those features? If they're looking for a simpler
interface, then maybe Evil would help, but then there are a few nice
GUIs for emacs that might make more sense.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Thursday, November 28, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment