Re: java keyword syntax highlighting

I've tried setting all of the following evs to 1, but it didn't
help.
java_allow_cpp_keywords
java_highlight_all
java_highlight_java_lang_ids

I also diff'd the three syntax/java.vim files from my mac with the one
on my ubuntu machine, but they are all exactly the same.
/Applications/Contents/Resources/vim/runtime/syntax/java.vim
/Applications/MacVim.app/Contents/Resources/vim/runtime/syntax/
java.vim
/usr/share/vim/vim72/syntax/java.vim

I might try diff'ing all the syntax files and get back to you

On Apr 1, 5:10 pm, "Benjamin R. Haskell" <v...@benizi.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, chardson wrote:
> > I'm trying to figure out why there's a discrepancy between syntax
> > highlighting between my two setups:
>
> >      · OS 10.6, MacVim 7.2 stable 1.2
> >      · Ubuntu 9.04, Vim 7.2.079
>
> > A while ago I moved my .bashrc, .vimrc, and .vim/ to a git repository
> > shared on both machines.  They are both at the same version and I've
> > ensured that none of the files are missing from the repository.
>
> See the recent vim_use thread about Java syntax highlighting:
>
> Why is "template" highlighted in Java code
>
> (OT: Maybe you didn't find it because you topeka'ed it on AltaVista?)
>
> If I'm not mistaken (big 'if' on this one), Ubuntu uses Debian for its
> upstream sources, and it sounds like there was a Debian packaging error
> that caused an odd version of syntax/java.vim to be included.
>
> Workaround for that problem would be to explicitly add:
>
> let java_allow_cpp_keywords=1
> (or 0, according to preference)
>
> (Though I thought the issue would only affect C++ keywords...
> Maybe there are other differences in the mispackaged version?)
>
> --
> Best,
> Ben

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.