> Ben Fritz wrote:
>> I personally like the fact that we don't need to worry about
>> the heavy spam filtering, server security, server
>> maintenance, version upgrades, etc. I like having a team of
>> (presumably paid?) support people that can come to our aid
>> when needed. The changes that are coming are, in my opinion,
>> mildly annoying but not a big deal. I was far more upset by
>> the ads that popped up and floated across my screen a few
>> times, and those were gone within a week. I'm willing to put
>> up with a few minor annoyances for the stability,
>> availability, speed, and relative ease of working with the wiki.
>>
>> I'm not picky, and I have no deep-rooted loyalty to Wikia,
>> but in my opinion they are still doing a pretty good job and
>> provide us a valuable resource.
>
> Yes, these are important points. I have mentioned them in the
> past but my irritation may have caused me to overlook them now.
>
> Another issue is liability: It is extremely unlikely that
> anything bad would ever happen, and I wouldn't worry about it,
> but it is nice that Wikia would be the first stop for anyone
> with a legal complaint.
>
> It looks like the bottom line of the new Wikia skin is that the
> font will be considerably smaller to fit text into the fixed
> 660 pixel width, and there will be more fluff.
>
> John
>
We-e-ell, if I get bothered enough by it I may try adding some CSS rules
more to my taste within a section of my SeaMonkey userContent.css wrapped in
@-moz-document domain(wikia.com) {
}
which is the (Mozilla proprietary) way of specifying style rules for use
only on a specific domain (and I'd add !important on all of them of course).
Best regards,
Tony.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment