On 11.05.12 13:58, Benjamin Fritz wrote:
> I myself get annoyed when I see a URL in a web browser and I need to
> copy-paste it to go to the address.
+1
> The attached is sort of what I had in mind (the look, not the markup...I
> wrote it by hand from scratch). It has the look from Vim but you're able to
> click on it as you'd expect from a browser.
The "Current Style" seems perfect. If a user does not want to click on
the current style, then there is no compunction to do so. AIUI, html is
for use with a browser, so TOhtml should provide for that. If a
demonstration is desired, then a demonstration of what is needed for
browsing seems to be the preferred demonstration. Demonstrating something
that is not useful for a browser is of dubious merit, I feel.
However, each to their own, so is it worth considering a configuration
option to tell TOhtml to generate neutered links when that is what a
user desires? Or add "TOhalf_html" ?
Erik
--
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher
regard those who think alike than those who think differently.
- Nietzsche
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Friday, May 11, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment