On Fri, 11 May 2012 07:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Ben Fritz <fritzophrenic@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, May 11, 2012 3:58:02 AM UTC-5, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
>wrote:
>> I would argue that the link conversion isn't what I'd expect of
>> TOhtml. I expected TOhtml to simply convert what I see in vim to
>> HTML - a code snippet that can be embedded in a web page, with the
>> possibility of copy/paste. (Otherwise, for looks, one could just use
>> a screenshot.)
>>
>
>I admit I was a little surprised to see it, but it's been there for a
>long time so I'm hesitant to take it out entirely. It is quite jarring
>to have the default browser style applied to such links and the Vim
>style applied to everything else.
I have only just detected TOhtml and obviously taken an interest with
my particular need in mind (embed a code snippet on a web page).
Please, excuse, if I therefore not appreciate other use cases for the
tool.
For example, I have created a vim syntax file for a markup language and
a test file containing URL pointing to non-existing pages). If I was to
write an article about it, the point of displaying the test file would
simply be to demonstrate vim's syntax highlighting. Converting the
links would be totally inappropriate.
>> For example, my style is a purple fg with NO border. The generated
>> vim style has no border attribute because normally it doesn't have to
>> override a default style with border. You would need a
>> "border:none !important".
>I haven't see a browser apply a border. Normally they apply an
>underline, which can be removed with text-decoration: none;
So, you would just have to apply "text-decoration:none" followed by the
vim syntax highlight class?
--
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz, Scotland
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Friday, May 11, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment