Friday, July 13, 2018

Re: Syntax matching question(s)

On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:25:29 PM UTC-4, Lifepillar wrote:
> >>> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 3:05:03 AM UTC-4, Lifepillar wrote:
>
> >>>> According to `:h syn-pattern`, syntax patterns are always interpreted
> >>>> as if 'magic' is on, so \v can be removed.
> >>>
> >>> If I take off the \v it breaks. So there is something wrong with how I am doing it.
> >>
> >> "\v" means "very magic", not "magic". By removing "\v", the "+" in your first pattern
> >> is taken literally, not as a quantifier.
> >
> > Excellent. That works now. :)
>
> Then I was misinterpreting the documentation. Apparently,
> syntax patterns ignore the 'magic' option, but not explicit
> flags in the regexp itself. Which makes sense, after all.
>
> Sorry for the noise,
> Life.

No no, your post made me try another tweak. I appreciate it.

--
Bob

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments: