> On Thu, April 12, 2012 08:13, Boyko Bantchev wrote:
>> The Euro sign is not the only difference between rfc1345 and the
>> output of :digraphs. I cannot tell what all of them are, but, e.g.,
>> the already mentioned /\ is known to Vim but is not in the rfc.
>> Perhaps, as well, Vim misses some definitions that the rfc has.
>
> Would be good to know, what else is missing, so one could add to the
> documentation.
I looked it up in the source. The /\ is an old digraph, which was defined
with Vim 5 and back then digraphs did not correspond to the RFC.
Starting with Vim 6, digraphs correspond to RFC1345, but Vim still
supports the old digraphs, if they are unambigous to RFC1345.
This is mentioned briefly at :h digraphs-changed
regards,
Christian
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment