> If I recall correctly, it's more than a year ago, that I provided the
> patch:
> .........
> I wouldn't call that recent anymore ;)
Your version of digraph.txt is not in the compiled versions of Vim
distributed from vim.org. It is not even in the source packages for
those who would compile Vim themselves.
So long as it is not in the current Vim distributions, this version
of digraph.txt is by no means representative of Vim. It is still
ineffective. Had you not mentioned it, I wouldn't even know it
existed. How would I?
Now, I did not intend to make a big deal of all this, but saying that
digraph.txt contains all digraph definitions, as was the case, is
simply misleading, because it appears to not be true for almost all
users of Vim.
>> In fact, even in its most recent version, digraph.txt is missing some
>> digraphs.
>> I just searched for the digraph /\ (for ×), and it is not in
>> http://code.google.com/p/vim/source/browse/runtime/doc/digraph.txt .
>
> Search for the hex code d7 and you'll find it.
What can be found is ×, but /\, as I said, is missing. Also missing
are c|, cO, n~, etc. – perhaps all those at the end of :digraph's
output. As long as they are effective in Vim, it is worth listing
them, too, in digraph.txt (under 'legacy' or whatever).
Regards,
Boyko
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment