> Phil Dobbin<phildobbin@gmail.com> a écrit:
>>
>> On 18/04/2012 21:56, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>>> Phil Dobbin wrote:
>>>
>>>> I posted several weeks back postulating about producing a hard
>>>> copy (or dead tree if you so wish) version of the Vim User&
>>>> Reference manual.
>>>
>>> I suppose you will need users to proof-read the result? Perhaps
>>> we should start with one file that is not long but does contain
>>> some challenges.
>>
>> Yes, proof readers would be of great benefit.
>
> Indeed. Actually, although proofreading at an early stage may be useful,
> it's not there it's going to be crucial, I believe. The first file(s)
> we'll probably check ourselves, if only because we'll be testing the
> translation process. Now, when that process seems ok, and we start
> translating files massively, then we'll definitely need people to read
> the PDF's and make sure they're fine in themselves and with respect to the
> original text files.
Add me to the list of volunteers for proofreading.
Will you be sending the PDF's out as attachments to email, or is there a
site where they can be fetched?
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment