>
> On 18/04/2012 21:56, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > Phil Dobbin wrote:
> >
> >> I posted several weeks back postulating about producing a hard
> >> copy (or dead tree if you so wish) version of the Vim User &
> >> Reference manual.
> >
> > I suppose you will need users to proof-read the result? Perhaps
> > we should start with one file that is not long but does contain
> > some challenges.
>
> Yes, proof readers would be of great benefit.
Indeed. Actually, although proofreading at an early stage may be useful,
it's not there it's going to be crucial, I believe. The first file(s)
we'll probably check ourselves, if only because we'll be testing the
translation process. Now, when that process seems ok, and we start
translating files massively, then we'll definitely need people to read
the PDF's and make sure they're fine in themselves and with respect to the
original text files.
Best,
Paul
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment