> Is it fine to have a choice of plugin managers, or is this causing a
> headache (for users and/or for plugin writers). If yes, then we should
> pick one plugin manager and retire the others.
I'm glad you picked this topic up.
I personally use simple shell scripts to keep the git repos up to date. I don't think having the plugin manager built-in is a necessity although it would make things easier for newcomers, I guess.
IMHO almost any choice is better than the current situation.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment