> your scripts which means that they can change the description and upload new
> versions as well (This is similar to what can be done on github)
>
> I'm not sure whether a collaborator should be able to add/drop other
> collaborators.
I think it is better to have two kinds of collaborators. One kind has
the ability to do so while the other kind doesn't have the privilege.
Although one should trust his/her collaborators, there might still
exist some accident, such as one loses his password. In this way, we
could reduce the possibility of such things.
> 2) force users to give a reason if they vote something down. This will be
> kind of dialog and it'll help devs to understand user requirements
Is this reason only visible to devs?
Thanks for your hard-working.
Hong Xu
2011/1/1
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment