> I thought 7.3.796 fixed this so [^\n] is the same as '.'? Isn't that the case?
Rererad my message. My point is that [^\n] should *not* be the same as
'.' following the principle of least surprise.
Or tell me why there should be two ways to express the same - but no
sane way to express [^\n].
If its not possible to make [^\n] behave the way you expect there should
be an error instead.
Marc Weber
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment