On Friday, 2 January 2015 19:18:27 UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Friday, January 2, 2015 11:46:17 AM UTC-6, Shiny Bling wrote:
> > On Friday, 2 January 2015 18:28:19 UTC+1, Дарио Ѓорѓевски wrote:
> > > Are your compiles 32- or 64-bit?
> >
> > 32bit. Is there any real advantage having 64 build?
> >
>
> I started self-compiling 64-bit, mainly because there is a server at work I use for a couple web services I administer, which is running Windows Server 2008 R2 and does not include the WOW64 system (and thus cannot run 32-bit binaries).
>
> But I doubt very many people need a fully-featured Vim with all dependency DLLs for that. I think I haven't updated that install since sometime late in Version 7.3.x.
>
> The other advantage is when using :! to run some standard system utilities like chcp which are not on the 32-bit path by default. But there are workarounds for that.
>
> That, and you can install 64-bit versions of the dependency DLLs. But you've gotten rid of that sort of concern.
>
> List of other reasons here, mostly not all that compelling: http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Where_to_download_Vim
Thanks, I leave the 64bit build for later then.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment