Re: Unexpected effect of "g:netrw_fastbrowse=2"

Jean Johner wrote:
> Hi Chip!
>
> I had no answer for the above message.
>
> My version of netrw is v137l.
>
> With "let g:netrw_fastbrowse" absent, "let g:netrw_fastbrowse=0", "let
> g:netrw_fastbrowse=1", the netrw buffer is always marked unlisted (It
> appers with "u" when you type :ls!), so that it never shows when you
> use :bp. Which is in my opinion the expected behaviour.
>
> With "let g:netrw_fastbrowse=2", the netrw buffer is no longer
> unlisted after the second ":e." call, so that it shows when you
> use :bp. Can you reproduce that?
>

I do see the effect -- its on my todo list. It might be awhile, though...

Regards,
Chip Campbell

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.