Re: Why is there no :foldupdate?

On Wed, March 31, 2010 5:15 pm, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Paul wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:02:41PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
>> > But this looks so fundamental, that I am wondering, whether I am the
>> > only one who is missing :foldupdate. Does anybody else think so? Or
>> > am I missing something obvious?
>>
>> You are not the only one. Every once in a while I will somehow see my
>> folds messed up after some serious editing, when I know they are
>> correct, and have to quit and re-edit the file in order to have them
>> show correctly.
>
> I generally just type Ctrl-L to clear and redraw the screen. For most
> filetypes I prefer fdm=syntax, so maybe something's different with
> fdm=expr.

Ctrl-L does not update folds.
(Usually I don't use folding. Only when searching for something
I find foldmethod=expr convenient).

> I notice the improper folds most frequently when I've just added another
> branch to a conditional (e.g. turning something with the structure
> if(1){}else{}
> into
> if(1){}elsif(2){}else{}
> ) but I can't seem to come up with a good minimal case. I'll try to do
> that next time I notice the problem.

I remember that fdm=syntax is mentioned several times in todo.txt.

regards,
Christian

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.