2010/3/24 Christian Brabandt <cblists@256bit.org>
I just went to say that. But less will probably probably spent much more memory than 'more' (it's not a joke ;-)) because it can transparently handle streams (but I think remember that it uses intermediate file to do that).
...Of course. But it could be interesting to use the option -B (and, optionally, -b).
By the way, you can try it and, if goes bad, then use more instead.
Also, with sed, you may use -u option to avoid buffering problems.
Regards.
On Wed, March 24, 2010 2:23 pm, lmhelp2 wrote:I think less and probably also more/most only load that part
> For the moment, I am just trying to view the file's contents...
> some other program is supposed to perform things afterwards
> I haven't yet faced that matter.
of the data that they display.
I just went to say that. But less will probably probably spent much more memory than 'more' (it's not a joke ;-)) because it can transparently handle streams (but I think remember that it uses intermediate file to do that).
...Of course. But it could be interesting to use the option -B (and, optionally, -b).
By the way, you can try it and, if goes bad, then use more instead.
Also, with sed, you may use -u option to avoid buffering problems.
Regards.
--
Joan Miquel Torres__________________________________
Linux Registered User #164872
http://www.mallorcaweb.net/joanmiquel
BULMA: http://bulma.net http://breu.bulma.net/?l2301
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to vim_use+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment