Re: Fwd: Mouse reporting and new standards

On Jan 21, 11:19 am, Bram Moolenaar <B...@Moolenaar.net> wrote:
> Egmont Koblinger wrote:
> > I think all your technical questions are answered in the first comment of
> >http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/2662-- please see that, and of
> > course feel free to ask if you have any more questions.
>
> Thanks, that helps.  However, it appears that the "second new extension"
> is not actually supported by xterm yet.  Did Thomas Dickey say something
> about this?

yes - in discussing this with Egmont a few months ago, I pointed out
some
technical deficiencies with the 1015 code, and also noted a problem
with urvt's
implementation of 1005 (if the locale encoding isn't UTF-8, it won't
report positions
past 50x95).

I followed up by implementing a 1006 which lacks the defects that I
noted in urxvt's design.
Those points are summarized in the change-log for #277, as well as in
ctlseqs.
http://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.log.html#xterm_277
http://invisible-island.net/xterm/ctlseqs/ctlseqs.html

(Actually I made these changes at the beginning of December, but other
work
got in the way of a more rapid update- hence the late release for
vttest to
demonstrate the feature).

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php