A. 'Vimball is evil' arguments:
1. Binaries not supported.
2. "Bad" extension.
3. No compression.
B. 'Vimball is good' arguments (couldn't find a better antonym for evil):
1. Easy to use.
2. Part of standard Vim distribution.
3. Plain text.
4. Destination of scripts can be specified.
Point A.1 could be a problem and I doubt it can be easily fixed without adding dependencies, but most scripts are plain text only, so I don't see it as a big issue.
The author has already offered to address A.2, which doesn't look like a mayor problem either.
A.3 could be a problem for very slow connection downloading a very big vimball archive, a non so common situation given the size of scripts and current tipical bandwith used this days (a telephone modem would be fast enough for most plugins).
So, I still don't get why there's opposition against vimball archives, they seem like a good option to distribute vim plugins.
Israel
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
No comments:
Post a Comment